src/auth/auth.service.ts

@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ export class AuthService {
     if (!record || record.revokedAt || record.expiresAt < new Date() || !record.session) {
       throw new UnauthorizedException("Invalid or expired refresh token.");
     }
-    await this.assertSessionMatches(record.session, context);
+    this.assertSessionMatches(record.session, context);
     const sessionNonce = this.createSessionNonce();
     await this.prisma.refreshToken.update({ where: { id: record.id }, data: { revokedAt: new Date() } });
     await this.prisma.session.update({
@@ -511,32 +511,20 @@ export class AuthService {
     return { session, sessionNonce };
   }
 
-  private async assertSessionMatches(
+  private assertSessionMatches(
-    session: { id: string; userId: string; revokedAt: Date | null; expiresAt: Date; ipHash: string; userAgentHash: string; nonceHash?: string | null },
+    session: { revokedAt: Date | null; expiresAt: Date; ipHash: string; userAgentHash: string; nonceHash?: string | null },
     context?: RequestContext,
   ) {
     if (session.revokedAt || session.expiresAt < new Date()) {
       throw new UnauthorizedException("Session expired.");
     }
-    if (!session.nonceHash || !context?.sessionNonce || session.nonceHash !== this.hashToken(context.sessionNonce)) {
-      throw new UnauthorizedException("Session nonce mismatch.");
-    }
-    // IP and user-agent are monitored as abuse/risk signals rather than
-    // enforced as a hard match — see JwtAuthGuard for the same reasoning.
     const ipHash = this.hashBindingValue(context?.ipAddress ?? "unknown-ip");
     const userAgentHash = this.hashBindingValue(context?.userAgent ?? "unknown-user-agent");
-    const ipChanged = session.ipHash !== ipHash;
+    if (session.ipHash !== ipHash || session.userAgentHash !== userAgentHash) {
-    const userAgentChanged = session.userAgentHash !== userAgentHash;
+      throw new UnauthorizedException("Session binding mismatch.");
-    if (ipChanged || userAgentChanged) {
+    }
-      await this.abuseService?.recordEvent({
+    if (!session.nonceHash || !context?.sessionNonce || session.nonceHash !== this.hashToken(context.sessionNonce)) {
-        userId: session.userId,
+      throw new UnauthorizedException("Session nonce mismatch.");
-        eventType: "SESSION_BINDING_DRIFT",
-        riskPoints: ipChanged && userAgentChanged ? 6 : 3,
-        severity: "low",
-        ipAddress: context?.ipAddress,
-        userAgent: context?.userAgent,
-        metadata: { ipChanged, userAgentChanged, via: "refresh" },
-      });
     }
   }
 

src/common/guards/jwt-auth.guard.ts

@@ -52,32 +52,14 @@ export class JwtAuthGuard implements CanActivate {
         session.userId !== payload.sub ||
         session.revokedAt ||
         session.expiresAt < new Date() ||
+        session.ipHash !== this.hashBindingValue(requestContext.ipAddress ?? "unknown-ip") ||
+        session.userAgentHash !== this.hashBindingValue(requestContext.userAgent ?? "unknown-user-agent") ||
         !session.nonceHash ||
         !requestContext.sessionNonce ||
         session.nonceHash !== this.hashBindingValue(requestContext.sessionNonce)
       ) {
         throw new UnauthorizedException("Invalid session binding.");
       }
-      // IP and user-agent are recorded and monitored as abuse/risk signals
-      // rather than enforced as a hard match: real users legitimately change
-      // IP mid-session (mobile networks, corporate NAT pools, VPNs, CDN edge
-      // changes) far more often than an attacker would be replaying a stolen
-      // token, and the still-enforced single-use rotating nonce plus
-      // refresh-token rotation already prevent token replay from another
-      // device.
-      const ipChanged = session.ipHash !== this.hashBindingValue(requestContext.ipAddress ?? "unknown-ip");
-      const userAgentChanged = session.userAgentHash !== this.hashBindingValue(requestContext.userAgent ?? "unknown-user-agent");
-      if (ipChanged || userAgentChanged) {
-        await this.abuseService.recordEvent({
-          userId: session.userId,
-          eventType: "SESSION_BINDING_DRIFT",
-          riskPoints: ipChanged && userAgentChanged ? 6 : 3,
-          severity: "low",
-          ipAddress: requestContext.ipAddress,
-          userAgent: requestContext.userAgent,
-          metadata: { ipChanged, userAgentChanged },
-        });
-      }
       const nextNonce = crypto.randomBytes(32).toString("base64url");
       const response = context.switchToHttp().getResponse<{ setHeader(name: string, value: string): void }>();
       await this.prisma.session.update({

src/main.ts

@@ -25,16 +25,6 @@ async function bootstrap() {
     rawBody: true, // Required for Stripe webhook signature verification
   });
 
-  // ─── Trust the reverse proxy / load balancer in front of this app ─────────
-  // Without this, Express's req.ip (and therefore per-IP rate limiting) sees
-  // the proxy's own connecting IP for every request instead of the real
-  // client IP, so every user behind the same proxy shares one rate-limit
-  // bucket. Only relevant in production, where a proxy is expected; in local
-  // dev the app is hit directly.
-  if (isProduction) {
-    app.getHttpAdapter().getInstance().set("trust proxy", 1);
-  }
-
   // ─── Security headers ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────
   const scriptSrc = isProduction ? ["'self'"] : ["'self'", "'unsafe-inline'"];
   const styleSrc = isProduction ? ["'self'"] : ["'self'", "'unsafe-inline'"];