6 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
d150509978 |
feat(phase-8): Billing API with server-side feature gating
Some checks failed
CI / Lint, Unit & Integration Tests (push) Has been cancelled
Add real Shopify Billing API integration: Free/Starter/Growth/Pro plans (app/lib/billing-plans.ts, priced per PRODUCT_STRATEGY.md §6) wired into shopify.server.ts's billing config, a merchant-facing plan page (app/routes/app.billing.tsx) using billing.request/billing.cancel, and webhooks.app_subscriptions.update.tsx as the durable sync path for Shop.tier (fires even when a merchant cancels from Shopify's own billing page, not just from this app). Gate the features actually built so far in both loader and action (never just hidden in the UI, so a direct POST can't bypass a tier limit): delivery zones/rates require Growth+, the dispatch dashboard requires Starter+, and location count is capped per tier (Free=1, Starter=3, Growth/Pro=unlimited). Split pure tier logic (app/lib/billing-plans.ts) from DB-backed reads/writes (app/services/billing.server.ts) so the client-rendered UpsellState component can import the Tier type without pulling server code into the client bundle — same split as currency.ts. Covered by tests/unit/billing-plans.test.ts (pure tier ranking/mapping) and tests/integration/billing.test.ts (tier persistence and location-limit enforcement against live Postgres). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
5b2207a397 |
feat: Phase 7 — POS + Checkout UI extensions
Some checks failed
CI / Lint, Unit & Integration Tests (push) Has been cancelled
Also fixes the [events] gate that was blocking ALL extension generation
(discovered while starting this phase).
- shopify.app.toml: this org appears enrolled in Shopify's "Next
Generation Events" developer preview, which the CLI now treats as a
REQUIRED top-level [events] section even though nothing in this app
actually uses it (real webhook handling is entirely classic [webhooks],
unaffected). Iteratively discovered the required shape from the CLI's
own field-by-field validation errors, then found the real docs (Events
is optional/developer-preview, api_version pinned to "unstable") to
confirm rather than keep guessing. Added a functionally-inert
[[events.subscription]] placeholder + a stub handler
(webhooks.events.placeholder.tsx) solely to satisfy the gate.
- app/services/availability-request.server.ts +
app/services/hold-request.server.ts: extracted the resolution logic that
used to live directly in apps.scheduling.availability.tsx/hold.tsx into
shared functions. This is what actually makes "same capacity pool feeds
every surface" (CLAUDE.md) true by construction rather than by
convention — the storefront, POS, and checkout routes now call the exact
same code, not three copies that could quietly drift apart.
- extensions/pos-datetime (generated via `shopify app generate extension
--template=pos_smart_grid` — pos_action's flavor requirement contradicted
the CLI's own global --flavor validator, so smart_grid was used instead):
a home-screen tile opening a modal where staff pick method -> date -> time
against the same availability/hold endpoints (pos.scheduling.*.tsx,
session-token authenticated), writing the same dd_* cart properties via
CartApi.addCartProperties — booking.server.ts needed zero changes to
handle POS-originated orders. Several API-shape guesses (toast isError
option, ChoiceList's `value`/`label` props, a nonexistent
action.dismissModal(), shopify.cart.cart.current) were wrong and caught
by typechecking directly against @shopify/ui-extensions' own bundled
.d.ts files (`npm run typecheck:pos`, now also in CI) — none of this was
verified against a live POS session, which isn't possible in this
environment.
- extensions/checkout-datetime (generated via `--template=checkout_ui`):
the Plus-only native picker in checkout itself
(purchase.checkout.block.render) plus a Thank You confirmation block
(purchase.thank-you.block.render). Went looking for an order-status
target too ("all plans show confirmed slot on thank-you/order-status" is
the Phase 7 accept criterion) and confirmed via the installed package's
own type definitions that purchase.order-status.block.render does not
exist in this API version — checkout UI extensions' thank-you/order-status
surfaces are Plus-only regardless. The actual "all plans" mechanism is
extensions/datetime-widget/blocks/order-confirmation.liquid — a new Theme
App Extension block reading order.note_attributes, which works on every
plan since it's plain Liquid, not checkout extensibility.
Both new UI extensions share one real unverified assumption, called out in
code comments: process.env.APP_URL is expected to be substituted at build
time by the Shopify CLI to the app's backend origin, since these run in a
different origin than the app and need an absolute URL, unlike the
storefront widget's relative /apps/scheduling/* path. Needs confirming
against a live dev session.
Verified: lint, typecheck (root + both new extensions'
`npm run typecheck:pos`/`typecheck:checkout`, all now in CI), 102 unit +
18 integration tests (unchanged — this phase didn't touch pure business
logic, only added thin auth wrappers around already-tested services), both
admin/widget builds.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
0538980eb5 |
fix: drop unused read_customers scope — likely the real GDPR gate trigger
Commenting out the 3 compliance-topic webhook subscriptions (previous commit) didn't clear the "not approved to subscribe to webhook topics containing protected customer data" error — same 3 errors, same wording, even with those blocks fully removed from shopify.app.toml. That means the gate isn't about our webhook declarations at all; it's much more likely triggered by the `read_customers` OAuth scope itself; Shopify's Protected Customer Data Access requirement applies to the scope, and the CLI's error message just reuses the same generic wording for the whole policy category regardless of which part of the config triggered it. Removed read_customers from shopify.app.toml, .env, and .env.example. This is also independently correct per CLAUDE.md's "request the minimum OAuth scopes needed" — nothing in the codebase actually calls the Customers API; Booking.customerEmail/customerPhone come straight off the orders/create webhook payload, which read_orders already covers. Add it back only when a feature that genuinely needs it exists, and expect to need Protected Customer Data Access granted at that point regardless. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
cc3303d318 |
fix: disable GDPR compliance webhooks pending Protected Customer Data access
shopify app dev refused to push the 3 mandatory compliance-topic webhooks (customers/data_request, customers/redact, shop/redact) with "This app is not approved to subscribe to webhook topics containing protected customer data" — subscribing to these requires the org to first request and be granted Protected Customer Data Access in the Partner Dashboard, a manual approval step outside the CLI/config entirely. Commented out the three subscription blocks in shopify.app.toml (handlers are untouched and still fully wired) so dev can proceed now. README.md gets a new "Before public launch" section as the reminder to re-enable them once access is granted — this is a hard requirement for BfS/public submission per CLAUDE.md, not something to forget once dev is unblocked. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
381c52d01a |
fix: replace hand-scaffolded Functions with real CLI-generated ones
The user linked the app to a real Partner org and hit two live errors
running `shopify app dev`, which is exactly the verification the earlier
hand-scaffolded Functions couldn't get in this environment. Root-caused and
fixed both, then went further: regenerated both Functions from scratch via
`shopify app generate extension` (now possible — the user's session had
authenticated) instead of patching the guesses.
What broke and why:
- `shopify app config link` pulled a fresh app's (empty) remote config and
overwrote shopify.app.toml, dropping the webhook subscriptions and
app_proxy block — restored both, keeping the real client_id/name/scopes
the CLI set.
- `[extensions.build.watch]` as a nested table was invalid TOML for this
field — it's a plain `watch = [...]` array directly under
`[extensions.build]`.
- The real failure ("doesn't have a build command or it's empty") turned
out to be a red herring pointing at a stale filename
(shopify.function.extension.toml, not the current shopify.extension.toml)
— the actual problem was that `@shopify/shopify_function` was never
installed for these extensions (confirmed: no node_modules), because
hand-writing package.json doesn't run the install step
`shopify app generate extension` does automatically.
Rather than keep guessing at the toolchain, regenerated both Functions for
real:
- `shopify app generate extension --template=cart_checkout_validation` and
`--template=delivery_customization` (--flavor=vanilla-js), which produces
a working vite/vitest-based build+test setup, real
`@shopify/shopify-function-test-helpers` fixture testing (builds actual
WASM and runs it via function-runner), and a generated GraphQL type file
per extension.
- This surfaced several concrete corrections to what was hand-written
before: the real target names are `cart.validations.generate.run` and
`cart.delivery-options.transform.run` (not `purchase.validation.run` /
`purchase.delivery-customization.run`), current api_version is 2026-07
(not 2025-01), the validation output wraps errors in
`operations: [{ validationAdd: { errors } }]` with a plain `message`
field (not top-level `errors` with `localizedMessage`), and the rename
operation is `deliveryOptionRename: { deliveryOptionHandle, title }` (not
`rename: { deliveryOptionHandle, title }`).
- Rewrote each extension's `.graphql` input query to request our actual
dd_* cart attributes (plus delivery option handles for the rename case),
regenerated types via `npm run typegen` in each, and ported the pure
evaluate.js decision logic (same exported function names/behavior as
before, now proven correct against the live schema) into the adapter
file the generator expects.
- Replaced each extension's demo fixture with ones matching our real
logic; `npm test` inside each extension now compiles real WASM and runs
function-runner against them — this is strictly stronger verification
than the previous pure-JS-only unit tests (which are kept too, unchanged,
since the evaluate.js files kept the same interface).
Repo-wide wiring: extensions/*/generated and extensions/*/dist are not
committed (matches the CLI's own per-extension .gitignore) — added
`npm run typegen:functions` (runs automatically before `npm run typecheck`
via a pretypecheck hook) and `npm run test:functions`, both now also in CI.
Root `npm install` picked these two folders up as proper npm workspace
members (they already have their own package.json from generation).
Verified: lint, typecheck, all 52 unit tests, all 8 integration tests, both
extensions' real WASM/function-runner test suites (5 fixtures total), and
both `npm run build` / `npm run build:widget` all pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
0303eba07a |
feat: scaffold Phase 0 — Remix app template, CI, Redis/BullMQ, test harness
Bootstraps from Shopify's official shopify-app-template-remix (cloned directly rather than via `shopify app init`, which requires an interactive Partner login unavailable in this session): - Prisma (SQLite dev / Postgres-ready) with baseline Session model + migration - Vitest configured for unit tests, Playwright configured for E2E - Redis client + BullMQ worker skeleton (app/lib/redis.server.ts, jobs/worker.ts) - shopify.app.toml: minimal scopes, GDPR + orders webhooks wired (stub handlers), app proxy config for the future storefront widget - Stripped template-repo-only meta files (CLA, issue templates, demo product page) and replaced CI with a lint+typecheck+test workflow - Bumped @shopify/shopify-app-session-storage-prisma to resolve a duplicate @shopify/shopify-api install that broke typecheck - Dropped the Jest-only ESLint config (template default) since the project standardizes on Vitest per IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md Verified: npm install, lint, typecheck, unit tests, prisma migrate dev, and npm run build all pass on Node 22 LTS. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |